Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Reviewing the research progress of library information and archives in the past five years is conducive to grasping the structure and evolution of knowledge domains in subject areas. [Method/process] This paper used the method of bibliometrics to conduct a quantitative analysis of the 20 Chinese journals in the field of library information and archives from the perspective of the total papers, highly cited papers, academic influence, research hotspots, and research trend prediction. [Result/conclusion] From the perspective of the total number of articles published, the number of articles published in Chinese journals has decreased year by year, the proportion of foreign language journal articles in each year increases year by year and the research in the field has gradually been in line with international standards. In addition to continue to follow up basic theoretical research and practical innovation research, the subject area also maintains a high degree of attention to data research and digital humanities. In the context of the digital and digital data era, the discipline urgently needs to complete the reconstruction of the discipline system and capabilities, and the discipline transformation tends to data science and big data. Research in the subject area pays more attention to the user/reader’s experience and the research of resources co-construction and sharing.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] By studying the evaluation of the discourse power of academic journals on the WeChat public platform, the evaluation index system and evaluation model can be established, which can enrich the discourse power evaluation system of academic journals under the new media environment, to provide inspirations for academic journals to develop new academic media with the help of WeChat platform and promote the transformation and upgrading of academic journals in the new media era. [Method/Process] Referring to the 'full evaluation’ framework, this paper designed the evaluation index system of academic journals WeChat public account discourse power, and used the analytic hierarchy process to give the index weight and construct the evaluation model. According to the weight of each index, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to comprehensively analyze the WeChat public account of the selected sample journals. [Result/Conclusion] The evaluation results show that the top-ranking academic journals are good at grasping the development opportunities of the new media era, seizing the development opportunities and starting rights of academic journals, and leading the academic discourse. But overall academic journals WeChat public platform recognition is not strong, and there is low trust and platform construction differences. In the future, operation also needs to pay attention to the quality of services and the spread and influence of tweets, to improve platform operation and user experience.
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment