Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Library science, information science and archival science are important subjects to cultivate new type of information knowledge talents. This paper reveals the research hotspots and trends of Chinese and foreign periodicals in Library Information and Archives discipline during the 13th Five Year Plan period, in order to provide some ideas for the future subject research in China, which would promote the discipline development of Library Information and Archives and enhance the academic discourse power. [Method/process] This paper selected domestic CNKI and foreign web of science databases as the data sources, took the core journal papers of Library and information archives from 2016 to 2020 as the research samples, and used the visual software such as Citespace,VOSviewer and Gephi to reveal the research hotspots and development trends of Chinese and foreign periodicals. From the following aspects, the number of publication and citations, the distribution of co-occurrence and timely distribution of keywords, the research hotspots and development trends of Chinese and foreign periodicals were revealed. [Result/conclusion] During the 13th Five-Year Plan period, the number of papers published in Chinese journals decreased slightly, while the number of papers published in foreign journals showed an upward trend. The research in the field of disciplines was gradually internationalized. The characteristics of research hotspots are as follows: the research topics are diversified; The research on related topics of "library" is gradually deepened. Chinese and foreign papers follow the research hotspots and trends of this subject closely, but each has its own emphasis. As a whole, papers in Chinese and foreign journals show a research trend of adhering to and deepening the traditional research field, integrating with other disciplines and expanding to the public domain.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] Academic discourse power is an integral part of China’s international discourse power system and the main manifestation of national political, economic, scientific and technological soft power. Analyzing the evaluation methods of academic discourse power and comprehensively comparing the advantages, disadvantages and stability of different methods are helpful to provide certain references for the evaluation of academic discourse power. [Method/Process] Six assignment methods without comprehensive evaluation values were used for single model evaluation, and fuzzy combination evaluation was carried out on the results after passing the non-parametric test to reduce the tendency of single evaluation and improve the credibility of evaluation, and BP neural network was introduced to construct neural network model based on gradient descent algorithm. [Result/Conclusion] This paper constructs an academic discourse power evaluation system based on three dimensions: academic leadership based on the innovation leading index, academic influence based on the citation analysis index and academic communication capacity based on the Altmetrics index. Fuzzy Borda evaluation allows for a combination of high and low evaluation scores and evaluation ranking for a single model, and realizes the internal combination of objective information, which has higher accuracy than the single evaluation model. Based on this, an evaluation model of academic discourse power integrated with BP neural network was constructed.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] By studying the evaluation of the discourse power of academic journals on the WeChat public platform, the evaluation index system and evaluation model can be established, which can enrich the discourse power evaluation system of academic journals under the new media environment, to provide inspirations for academic journals to develop new academic media with the help of WeChat platform and promote the transformation and upgrading of academic journals in the new media era. [Method/Process] Referring to the 'full evaluation’ framework, this paper designed the evaluation index system of academic journals WeChat public account discourse power, and used the analytic hierarchy process to give the index weight and construct the evaluation model. According to the weight of each index, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to comprehensively analyze the WeChat public account of the selected sample journals. [Result/Conclusion] The evaluation results show that the top-ranking academic journals are good at grasping the development opportunities of the new media era, seizing the development opportunities and starting rights of academic journals, and leading the academic discourse. But overall academic journals WeChat public platform recognition is not strong, and there is low trust and platform construction differences. In the future, operation also needs to pay attention to the quality of services and the spread and influence of tweets, to improve platform operation and user experience.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] Academic discourse power is a carrier of national spirit and culture, and an important embodiment of national soft power. The research on the connotation, the formation mechanism, constituent elements and evaluation of academic discourse power, which is of great significance to improve the national soft power and carry forward the national spirit and culture. [Method/Process] This paper analyzed the mechanism of academic discourse power based on Foucault’s discourse power theory and Lasswell’s 5W communication theory, and focused on the connotation, formation process, constituent elements and the evaluation of academic discourse power. [Result/Conclusion] This paper holds that the components of academic discourse power are the subjects, carriers, the communication media, objects and the implementation effect of academic discourse power.According to the informetrics and scientific evaluation theory, this study constructs an evaluation index system of academic discourse power of scientific research institutions.
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment