Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Utilization of Information submitted time 2024-04-01
Abstract： Purpose/significance By utilizing the Data Citation Index (DCI) database, this article explores the reuse features and influencing factors of scientific data in the field of high-energy physics. These findings serve as a point of reference and support, facilitating the promotion of data sharing and citation standardization in China. Moreover, these contribute to the augmentation of both value and influence of scientific data. Method/process This article adopt statistical regression methods to analyze the basic and citation features of the DCI database. For the reuse features and influencing factors, the analysis includes three dimensions: scientific data attribute features, reuse features, and correlation between attribute and reuse features. Result/conclusion The research findings reveal that the publication volume of scientific data in the field of high-energy physics is exhibiting an increasing trend. However, the proportion of missing data fields is relatively high. The reuse of high-energy physics scientific data is significantly influenced by publication modes and disciplinary categories. These result in the extremely uneven distribution of citation frequency. High-level scientific data are more likely to be reused. Moreover, the standardization of scientific data sharing and citation needs further enhancement. Finally, we propose an optimization and improvement path for high-energy physics science data reuse based on this findings.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-07-04
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] To analyze the attitudes, measures and policies of the current academic publishing community in the face of artificial intelligence（AI） tools represented by ChatGPT, and to provide reference for the construction of academic publishing policy system in the context of AI4Science.[Method/process] The policies/statements of academic publishers on the use of AI tools were systematically scanned and analyzed by using the internet/literature research method and content analysis method. [Result/conclusion] Different academic publishers respond to the use of AI tools at different speeds, but their concerns and key policy factors are relatively consistent. However, as to policy/statement key terms and specific operations, various types of academic publishers show great differences. The academic publishing community's response to the use of AI tools will still be in the stage of continuous exploration and debugging. All academic publishers should strengthen communication and coordination, actively formulate a policy framework to deal with the use of AI tools, and clarify the definitions, connotations, and boundaries of key policy elements and key terms. The academic community should be fully linked to build a policy system on the use of AI tools.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-07-02
Abstract： [Objective] To analyze the open access practices of academic publishers in the context of the development of the open science movement and to explore the development trend of open access in academic publications.
[Methods] We used two methods: web survey and literature research to investigate the history of open access to scholarly publications and the practices of scholarly publishers in promoting open access in the context of open science.
[Results] Academic publishers promote open access to scholarly publications mainly in five aspects: conversion agreements, scholarly journal subscriptions, open access to research monographs, scientific data sharing, and open peer review.
[Conclusions] Publishers actively respond to open science initiatives and promote scientific research progress and innovation through practices such as accelerating the publication cycle of scholarly results, shifting to operational strategies that attract authors, and building integrated platform.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-06-23
Abstract： Purpose/Significance This study aims to investigate the concept, features, and influencing factors of the bottleneck techniques in response to the research and development demands. It employs research papers and news interviews to construct an influencing factors model that facilitates the path planning for advancements in this technique. Methods/Process The "genus-differentia" method is employed to define the bottleneck techniques and provide a comprehensive summary of its distinctive features. By considering the formation of influencing factors for the bottleneck techniques as the research question, the encoding method of grounded theory is applied to analyze textual corpus related to this technique, resulting in the development of an influencing factors model. Results/Conclusion The bottleneck technique is an industrially strategic technology at the current stage, deliberately chosen by innovative entities, characterized by originality, strategic importance, and substantial investment. The findings of grounded theory encoding categorize the influencing factors for the formation of the chokehold technique into five levels: industrial differentiation, competitive game, innovation system, production factors, and production transformation. External influencing factors include industrial differentiation as the foundational basis for competitive game. Internal influencing factors encompass the innovation system, production factors, and production transformation, with interactive relationships observed among them. The comprehensive understanding of the bottleneck technique’s concept, features, and influencing factors enables a more informed approach towards planning breakthroughs in this field. The identified influencing factors at different levels shed light on the industrial dynamics, competitive dynamics, and internal factors that contribute to the formation of the chokehold technique.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-01-06
Abstract：
Abstract【Purpose/Significance】Digital resource will become the main content of library resource construction, but library is faced with multiple dilemmas such as funding cuts, user demand increasing, and price rise of database providers continuously in the post epidemic period, It is urgent to explore the strategies to deal with these problems.【Method/Process】We condense digital price research findings into eight views include “monopoly theory” “pricing method theory” “game theory”and so on, and review them from the perspective of internal and external causes. According to the classification of the Natural Logic Model of the attribution theory of cognitive psychology, we determine the information conditions of consistency, differentiation and consistency, then conclude that the price fluctuation of digital resources is caused by individual and environmental factors, and individual factors are the main causes. The basis of "monopoly theory""pricing method theory" and "industry theory" are correct exploration of orientation.【Result/Conclusion】We should contemplate the universality of monopoly and analysis its crux , strengthen the function of library alliance in price coordination area, establish the theoretical research system of digital resource pricing, and adapt the new role of supporting open publishing when face to the problem of price fluctuation of digital resources.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Literature Work submitted time 2018-10-16
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] This paper aims at getting a comprehensive understanding for the quantity and OA ratio of OA papers, and making a preliminary evaluation of these papers. [Method/process] In this paper, we utilized Web of Science Core Collection as the data source and took the four dimensions: publication years, research areas, countries/territories and organizations. We investigated papers published in high-quality academic journals that recorded in WoS from 2002 to 2016. Then, we analyzed and interpreted the changes and trends of OA papers. Finally, we took Nature as an example and analyzed the quality of OA papers from the perspective of citation per paper and highly-cited papers proportion. [Result/conclusion] The number of OA papers in the world have been increasing year by year, especially in China. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is the institution which has the largest number of papers recorded in WoS, the number of OA papers took the first place in 2016, but the OA ratio still lagged behind major European and American institutions. The OA practice in the field of biological and medical sciences is superior to other research fields.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-10-23
Abstract： In the context of open publishing, this paper takes 10 typical open access mega-journal as the cases, with reference to the information of journal official websites, JCR (Journal Citation Report) and Scopus, and it analyzes the development status of 10 open access mega-journal from 5 aspects: impact factor, article volumes, article-processing charge, acceptance rate, publishing speed; then it discussion long-term positive influence and possible problems of open access mega-journal. The results of this study can be a reference for authors publishing in open access mega-journal and offer the enlightenment to journal policy-making.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-09-29
Abstract：[目的/意义]全球开放获取期刊的发展越来越受重视，持续关注全球开放获取期刊的进展为我国开放获取期刊的发展提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]对2016年世界重要开放获取期刊利益相关者，包括政府机构、科研资助机构、科研教育机构、出版商、国际组织、学/协会等进行动态跟踪和扫描，整理并分析2016年全球开放获取期刊的最新发展趋势和热点问题。[结果/结论]2016年全球开放获取期刊繁荣发展，并得到多方利益相关者的支持和推动，开放获取期刊的发展也面临一些问题和挑战，如开放获取期刊的质量问题、巨型开放获取期刊的未来发展问题。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2017-09-08 Cooperative journals: 《智库理论与实践》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] The resource and environment think tanks of the USA play an important role in global affairs. Its operation mechanism, think tank product systems and influence development mode are of great significance to our country’s think tank construction. [Method/process] This paper analyzed and summarized the characteristics and operation mechanism of American think tanks from various aspects based on the site inspection of several resources and environment think tanks in the United States. Given the demand and current situation of the resource and environment think tank construction in China, we put forward some recommendations for China’s construction of high-level think tanks of resources and environment. [Result/conclusion] The article argues that the construction of resource and environment think tanks in our country should gradually establish an influential think tank system, expand the channel of fund raising actively, raise the output of special field achievements and enhance the product influence.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2016-06-03
Abstract：［目的 ／意义］良好的科研数据管理具有支持开放科学和开放学术交流体系的重要作用，国外科研数据政策的实践经验可以为我国科研资助机构和信息服务机构提供参考借鉴。 ［方法 ／过程］运用文献综述和调研方法，针对国际主要科研资助机构的科研数据政策的要素进行分析。 ［结果 ／结论］科研资助机构的科研数据存储政策包括：类型、标准、位置、期限。 科研资助机构的科研数据质量监管政策包括：管理计划、权责机制、监督机制、奖惩机制。 科研资助机构的科研数据传播政策包括：隐私保护、知识产权界定、开放程度等。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment