Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-08-27 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] The factors that affect the coverage of altmetrics are discussed, which lays the foundation for the usage of altmetrics in academic evaluation.[Method/process] Based on Web of Science, Altmetric.com and Mendeley, the paper selected five disciplines' article papers published in 1996-2015, and discussed their differences of altmetrics coverage in terms of discipline, publishing year, journal, country and language.[Result/conclusion] Firstly, different altmetrics indicators have different coverage, and Mendeley is the highest. However, most indicators are very low. Secondly, it is necessary to distinguish and exclude the phenomenon of high coverage caused by the promotion strategy of journals when evaluating with altmetrics. Lastly, the coverage of altmetrics for different disciplines, year of publication, journals, countries and languages is different; therefore, it is necessary to consider the differences among different papers in the above factors when evaluating with altmetrics. When necessary, standardization should be taken into account.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-08-27 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] This paper aims to explore the effectiveness of Altmetrics in revealing the impact of academic books, and then put forward reasonable suggestions for academic book evaluation. [Method/process] Four Altmetrics indicators, Twitter reference, Mendeley reading, text review and libcitation are collected. After analyzing the coverage, quantiles and other statistics of books, the correlation between book citation and Altmetrics indicators is carried out. Books of high indicator values are evaluated from the aspects of published year, discipline and subject in order to explore the application of these indicators in the use of book impact evaluation. [Result/conclusion] The low correlation between book citation and Altmetrics indicators shows that Altmetrics can be used as a new perspective for evaluating academic books, and different Altmetrics indicators reveal different dimensions of book impact. It is suggested to combine Altmetrics indicators and citation and make more use of the characteristics of books such as year and discipline in the future research of book impact evaluation.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-07-26 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] In order to clarify the connotation and significance of the attention, dissemination and utilization of academic achievements in social media, to make a deep analysis of the altmetrics indicators that have been used and can be mined.[Method/process] From the perspective of event ontology, the acts related to academic achievements in social media are abstracted. Starting from the subject, object, product, type, motivation, time, place and resource of the event, the event model of social media is constructed. And the deep analysis of social media events is carried out with Mendeley and Twitter as examples.[Result/conclusion] At present, altmetrics aggregators only provide indicators from some social media events. Through the analysis of social media events and their elements, it is found that some other indicators with academic evaluation value should be included in evaluation system in the future, such as Mendeley group_count, Twitter favorite_count and so on. When using these indicators, it is necessary to evaluate the applicability of indicators in different academic evaluation contexts according to the elements of events. Meanwhile, the methods, frequencies and limitations of data acquisition should be taken into account to ensure the accuracy and scientificity of the indicators.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2023-07-26 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] This paper explores how to apply the libcitation in the evaluation of scholarly books, to make suggestions for the evaluation of scholarly books.[Method/process] The paper discussed how libcitations be produced, be obtained and how to use libcitations in evaluation of scholarly books, taking WorldCat as an example to conduct an empirical analysis and discussion.[Result/conclusion] Libcitations can be got from library union catalogs. When obtaining the data, the appropriate retrieval method should be selected according to the selected source, so as to obtain the collection information of the works accurately. In the application of the libcitations, the features of the library should be considered to evaluate the influence of works more comprehensively and accurately.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] From the perspective of digital humanities, this paper aims to realize the rational description of ancient buildings, and promote the protection and utilization of ancient buildings. [Method/process] This paper analyzed the existing resource organization methods, and took the Shichahai region as an example, based on the characteristics of the ancient buildings in the region and digital resources, by reusing existing metadata standards and ontology, combined with the custom entities and attributes, from the relationships between the ancient buildings and other entities and the character descriptions of ancient buildings to design ancient buildings description model. Information organization tools such as vocabularies were used to enrich the model. [Result/conclusion] Through the design of the model, the three-dimensional and multi-angle description of the ancient buildings in this region can be realized, as well as the integration of the ancient buildings and related objects, so as to improve the knowledge service ability related to ancient buildings.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] Scientific cooperation has become a common phenomenon in research activities, and many research projects have also included teamwork in the scope of assessment of implementation effects. Therefore, it is beneficial to the evaluation and sustainable development of the talents projects to explore the changes in the cooperation relationship before and after their receiving the support and explore the role of Cheung Kong Scholars in team building, international and domestic cooperation.[Method/process] In this study, we take the recipients in 2005 of the Cheung Kong Scholars Award as example and take the Wilcoxon signed rank test method to analyze the changes in the cooperative relationship before and after their receiving the award. The cooperative relationship includes the following aspects:the size of the cooperation social network, the strength of cooperation, the duration of cooperation, the role of cooperation, the strength of international and domestic cooperation. The dataset of this study comprised 83 researchers and 11 522 SCI/SSCI papers published between 1996 and 2015, and the analysis was divided into two 10-year periods-the preaward period (1996-2005) and the postaward period (2006-2015).[Result/conclusion] It is found that the Cheung Kong Scholars have played a leading role in team building, international and domestic cooperation after reviving the award. The scholars significantly increased their cooperation social networks (42 VS. 148) and enhanced their cooperation strength (2.17 VS. 2.45) with their partners in the postaward periods. However, the duration of cooperation between the recipients and their collaborators before and after receiving the award was relatively short, and nearly 70% of the cooperation lasted only one year. Moreover, the scholars' coauthorship patterns changed significantly after receiving the award. In both number and proportion, they became less likely to act as the first author, but more likely to be listed as the last author or corresponding author.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2022-09-04
Abstract： Abstract: Purpose/Significance Starting from China's demands for protection and regulation of disruptive technologies, this study provides reference for China's policy development direction by mining the focuses and evolution characteristics of related policies of the world's major powers. Method/Process Based on the set of disruptive technology policies during 1990-2020, the focuses distribution of policy topics is explored by LDA, and DTM is constructed by introducing time-series factors to analyze the evolution of the content and intensity of policy topics in different periods, and summarize the key policy experience of the major powers. Result/Conclusion This study divides the disruptive technology policies into seven periods. The evolution of policy focuses from the perspective of protection and regulation has three types: attenuation, growth and fluctuation. Relatively speaking, the protection policy topics are more centralized and coherent, and there is an obvious leadership topic "phased development planning". While the regulation perspective does not have a fixed leadership topic, but the topic integration range is larger, of which "cross domain regulatory cooperation" is an important role that closely links various topics.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Utilization of Information submitted time 2022-09-03
Abstract： Purpose/Significance Science and technology figure reports is an important form for the media to publicize profession models and set up profession benchmarks. Its public opinion guidance affects the understanding and attitude of researchers to research evaluation and the construction of a good academic environment to a certain extent. By analyzing how the mainstream media portray the research activities and achievements of researchers in science and technology figure reports, this study helps to improve China's research evaluation system. Method/Process The object of this study is the science and technology figure reports in SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DAILY. The main research activities and achievements of researchers are analyzed according to the statistical results of word frequency. Key assessment sentences are extracted to analyze the symbolic contributions of researchers. The achievements in the reports are extracted and the achievement de Result/Conclusion SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DAILY comprehensively reports the diverse research activities and achievements of researchers, and describes various types of achievements through various qualitative and quantitative indicators from the perspectives of quantity, quality and impact. And there are differences in the selection and de
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2022-09-02
Abstract： Purpose/Significance Exploring the optimization path of scientific research project performance evaluation and establishing an effective performance evaluation system of scientific research project are helpful for the reform of scientific research evaluation and our nation’s innovation-driven development. Method/Process Through a comprehensive survey of relevant research and practice at home and abroad, a meta-analysis method is used to comprehensively discuss the research priorities of the current scientific research project performance evaluation, and the main scientific research evaluation framework, scientific research achievement quality and impact evaluation indicators in various countries are comprehensively discussed. Sort out and analyze the content, and summarize and compare the project information database cases that assist the performance evaluation of scientific research projects through the case analysis method, and finally propose optimization path suggestions based on theoretical and practical analysis. Result/Conclusion We should build a differentiated scientific research project performance evaluation system according to the evaluation subject, project type and academic area. It should also enrich the indicators and methods of scientific research project achievement quality and impact evaluation, and further develop and improve the scientific research project achievement management platform to achieve data-driven performance evaluation.
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment